(2003) Peatland Restoration Guide, Second Edition. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 13706–13717. (2016) Factors affecting re-vegetation dynamics of experimentally restored extracted peatland in Estonia. Interventions within the moss layer transfer technique, tested individually: rewetting reprofiling sowing mosses or mixed vegetation adding mulch after planting fertilizing to complement planting. Related actions: restoration using other combinations of multiple interventions. Key peatland types where this action may be appropriate: bogs, fens/fen meadows, tropical peat swamps. whether they have been successfully restored).Ĭaution: Collecting plant fragments damages the donor site, although rapid recovery has been reported (Rochefort & Campeau 2002). undergoing the process of restoration) rather than the state of those areas (i.e. Whether it is more appropriate to introduce vegetation from bogs or fens will depend on the chemistry of the peat remaining in the degraded peatland (Quinty & Rochefort 2003). In this section, restored refers to areas where restoration interventions have been applied (i.e. The moss layer transfer technique is typically used to restore bogs damaged by peat extraction. To be included as evidence in this section, studies must have tested all five steps in combination – although fertilizing is an optional step that is not always appropriate (e.g. (5) Fertilizing with phosphorous to stimulate growth of nurse plants such as haircap moss. (4) Adding a straw mulch to provide shade and keep the surface of the peat moist. (3) Spreading plant fragments collected from the surface (top 10 cm) of a nearby bog. Surface peat may be pushed into water-retaining ridges around or across the peatland, achieving steps 1 and 2 in one go. clearing and flattening the peat surface. 2013) combines multiple interventions to restore peatlands: (1) Rewetting the peat, for example by blocking drainage ditches or building water-retaining ridges.
The moss layer transfer technique (Quinty & Rochefort 2003 Rochefort et al.
0 kommentar(er)
